"The main thing is to make sure students don't oversimplify war," says David Leheny, a professor of political science, who tries not to "allow students' pre-existing views to affect their judgment about what the war's effect on terrorism will be."
Leheny, who is teaching a course on terrorism and non-state violence this summer, says he hopes to show students the complexities of war and terrorism on multiple levels so that students can better develop their own opinions.
Professors find textbooks often fall short in times when current events constantly redefine the body of knowledge. Many of the models used by international relations scholars, for example, were strained by the unprecedented diplomatic gridlock at the United Nations prior to the war.
"We learn a lot of theories about the causes of war," says Jon Pevehouse, a professor of political science. "What I've been able to do, along with the class, is ask, 'Do we think this theory does a good job explaining what's going on right now?' In that way, we can show how the theory may or may not be relevant."
Pevehouse says that, by looking at the war through an academic lens, many professors were able to disarm students' prejudices and help them get a more well-rounded understanding of the conflict.
"I wanted to challenge them, but I didn't want to disrespect their views," Pevehouse says. "It's been, hopefully, interesting for the students. It's been interesting for me, because we think about theories to explain the world around us."
— Alexander Conant '02